While countless gallons of ink have been spilt on the biblical-theological issues related to the Eucharist, I’ve found that less work has been done on the “how to” aspect of celebrating Communion. So I started a series laying out a variety of models and issues connected to the Lord’s Supper, beginning with an introduction and the “Open Communion” position. I followed that up with the “Communion Served” approach. This week I want to briefly consider the implications of the relationship between the Eucharist and the charismata…
[Read more…]
A “How To” Guide to Celebrating Communion (part 2)
As I interact a lot with pastors and church planters and often am asked how to “do” certain ecclesial activities (things done among the Church), I’ve noticed over the past few years that many questions I’ve been asked are how the Lord’s Supper should be celebrated in a Vineyard church. Since I don’t believe there is only one way to celebrate the Eucharist, I thought it would be helpful to put together a number of posts for pastors and church planters to consider for when they prepare for Communion.
Last week I started this “how to” guide on celebrating Communion by introducing what I refer to as “Open Communion.” This week I want to briefly look at what I call “Communion Served.”
[Read more…]
A “How To” Guide to Celebrating Communion (part 1)
As anyone who has been in the Vineyard for a bit of time can tell you, there’s no such as the Vineyard way of doing a lot of things. Our movement is diverse enough that you’ll find a lot of great ways to do things, from a lot of great women and men spread across the Vineyard. Because of this, there are probably a lot of different ways in which Vineyard churches celebrate the Eucharist. Yet I’m often asked questions about what should be done, how it should be done, where should it take place during the worship gathering, and why it should be done certain ways. This is my attempt to provide you a resource to help you as your celebrate Communion.
[Read more…]
Ecclesiology is Radically Personal
I love my church. I know, I know… it’s not really my church. I serve Jesus’ church and I’m well aware of the fact that pastor’s would be wise to remember that they do not own the church’s they serve, nor do the church’s we serve need us in order to “make it.”
Yet Trinity Christian Fellowship is my church. And I love her. She’s mine in the sense that she’s the community that has allowed me to learn and grow and fail and fall down and get up and learn how to teach and lead and serve and try new things, including really dumb ideas, and it is the family of Jesus’ followers that has taught me about the gospel and the kingdom and challenged me to pursue being more like Jesus and seeking for the presence and power of the Holy Spirit.
In that regards, she’s my church, while being totally and completely Jesus’ church.
Yesterday, after our church’s Sunday morning worship gathering, I was sitting in my living room thinking about some of the people I’ve come to really love and consider to be close friends. I chalk this up to the fact that I’m doing a series on friendship, so maybe this is all just me being emotional. But it struck me just how deeply personal ecclesiology is and really should be.
I love ecclesiology. I am hoping to end up with a PhD in ecclesiology. I constantly find myself drawn to reading on, thinking about, engaging with, discussing, and writing about the Church. It’s the playground where pneumatology and missiology seem to beckon me, the space where spiritual formation tends to rest and relax. And I’m hopeful that the tradition and family of churches that I find myself in, the Vineyard, will continue to develop and articulate its own ecclesiology in a way that serves to connect us to the Missio Dei, as well as provide a framework for understanding our ontology.
It is really important to think about ecclesiology through a biblical-theological lens that is shaped by rigorous scholarly reflection. For my part, developing ecclesiological convictions should be done with a healthy awareness of Augustine, Rahner, Calvin, Moltmann, Küng, Newbigin, Barth, and soooooo many others.
Yet I can’t really think about ecclesiology without thinking about the personal aspect of being a part of and in a local church. In fact, my theological methodology reveals from the onset that any and all ecclesiological reflection that I develop is significantly shaped by the reality of being a part of a local church. To write ecclesiology void of this personal connection is, quite frankly, ridiculous.
Receiving the Personal Touch of Ecclesiology
Pastoring people is hard work. No one ever told me that I would experience betrayal or have people accuse me of things that I’ve never done or make assumptions about my intentions and motives that couldn’t be further from the truth. I could go on about the challenges but I’m not complaining. I love being a pastor. But it is hard work.
And I can’t tell you how many times there have been a few people that a part of the church family that step in to provide just the right encouragement at just the right time. I recall once being so discouraged and ready to give up that I actually wrote a resignation letter. And as I sat in my office trying to figure out what business would hire a pastor-theologian type of person, the feelings of defeat and discouragement just washed over me to the point of being even more discouraged than I already was… and then I received an email from someone telling me how they were so thankful for me and my family and for the sacrifices we made for the church. The email went on and on and on and on! Well, the resignation never made it beyond my laptop.
And then there was the time I was sitting in a hotel in Africa, after being completely undone by the reality of seeing poverty and oppression on a scale I couldn’t seem to shake. I found myself weeping and broken, unable to even think about the next few days of ministry. And at that very moment, I received an email from someone in my church letting me know they were praying for me and they imagined that seeing the children suffering was very hard and that they were hurting with me, even though we were thousands of miles apart.
And how could I ever forget the numerous times where Dawn and I have left our home in order to head to the hospital so that we could welcome one of our children into the world… only to return home to find our lawn mowed or drive-way plowed, not to mention meals and cards and gifts. I mean, for our last child born, our church threw us a huge baby-shower and we received too many clothes to mention, a new crib, toys, and enough diapers to last nearly six months.
The church is radically personal. And I am the better for it.
Expressing the Personal Touch of Ecclesiology
Not only does a local church provide love in ways that are received, it causes people, especially pastors, to express ideas and feelings that seem, well, weird.
Like when you know a person in the church is struggling through something but you also know they aren’t ready to talk about it or deal with it and all you can do is think about them and pray for them… and think some more… and pray some more… and think about it some more. I know it’s not healthy to be consumed by worry, but it’s hard not to think about the people you love and care for.
Or there are the times when, as a happens in life, tragedy strikes and the people you are called to love experience loss. How can you not jump in with both feet? It seems almost illegal and sinful not to show up at the hospital or the funeral home.
The church is radically personal. And I am the better for it. Hopefully others have been blessed by my attempts to express that!
The Radical and Powerful Realty of Ecclesiology’s Personal Dynamic
So I know me some systematic theology. I love me some biblical theology. I love me some exegesis. I love me some pneumatological empowered missiology. I love all things biblical and theological and I love the topic of ecclesiology. But I can’t even begin to think of ecclesiology as a theological category that is divorced from the local church, the community of God’s kingdom. I can’t even fathom writing ecclesiology that doesn’t reflect the positives or challenge the negatives of our churches.
Maybe that’s crazy and some scholars will balk at such a personal and experiential understanding to the doctrine of the Church. For me, this is just koinonia. You know… how it is supposed to be. The personal dynamic of ecclesiology causes me to see the subject, the Church, as being a radical and powerful reality. It’s not just theory, it’s personal.
What say you?
#VineyardGlobalFamily Recap (Day 1)
Eleanor Mumford. Just… Eleanor Mumford.
The first day of the #VineyardGlobalFamily conference was epic. In addition to seeing a ton of some of my favorite people in the world, I got to finally meet a ton of people that I’ve only known via Facebook or Twitter or even this here blog.
I started the day out helping and hanging with the Multiply Vineyard team because, well, evangelism, discipleship, and church planting are where my heart is at! The booth looks amazing and you should definitely stop by and say “hi.”
So after having what can only be described as a “family reunion,” my wife and I… dropped our kids off at their respective classrooms! Woohoo! Freedom! We’re so glad that the kids have age appropriate opportunities! 😉
The night started off with global worship music, including a choir. Yes. Yes. Yes. The music was fantastic and, once again, we in the Vineyard theologically understand our “times of worship” as sacramental encounters with God’s presence. It was incredibly rich.
Then our good and ever wonderful National Director, Phil Strout, introduced the evenings speakers: John and Eleanor Mumford.
Eleanor Mumford. Just… Eleanor Mumford.
The talk was somewhat of an overview of where the Vineyard comes from and where the Vineyard is. Yet it was also a passionate call for us to really consider where the Vineyard must and should go.
It. Was. Brilliant.
Pick up the tape, cd, mp3, or even the 8-track if it becomes available. As my buddy Michael Houle mentioned, this would be great “Vineyard 101” stuff.
Eleanor basically talked about a number of the Vineyard distinctives and also pointed out some of the remarkably “daft” (i.e., stupid) things that some people think or say. Like… chill out on whether or not people sing Hillsong or Bethel songs… geez. And that we should be distinct for something, not simply in order to be distinct. Oh… and saying we’re “cutting edge” is quite arrogant (but it is cutting edge to be on twitter, ha ha!).
The ministry time was classic Vineyard and I know a number of people were extremely blessed.
Eleanor Mumford. Just… Eleanor Mumford.
I really enjoyed yesterday. It had a certain quality about it that I can only describe with these words: I am home. The Vineyard movement isn’t perfect and certainly has its share of theological challenges ahead of us, but it’s my family and I love my family!
What was your favorite part of the day?
- What stood out to you?
- How would you describe the vibe?
- What was your favorite part of the evening?
PS: If you aren’t hip to what’s happening tonight, please be advised that everyone that is cool and wants revival and really loves Jesus will be wearing Hawaiian shirts. Just sayin’. #VineyardGlobalFamilyAloha
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next Page »